Protect what matters – even after you're gone. Make a plan for your digital legacy today.
1Password Environments Beta is awesome
Just wanted to drop some feedback after playing around with the new Environments Beta in 1Password. Honestly, I’m loving it so far. The local .env file mounting is just brilliant. Secrets are easy to access without having to run extra commands, but still secure – exactly what I want. Makes switching between machines seamless, too. A couple of things I’d really like to see next: 1. CLI Integration - being able to create/edit/list environments and variables from the terminal would make this so much more useful, right now, having to click around in the desktop app is a bit of a pain for dev workflows. 2. More integrations: AWS Secrets Manager is a great start, but would love to see GCP and other major providers such as GitHub, etc. A plugin system for integrations would be awesome also to help cover more niche players like Modal.com Overall, this is a huge step in the right direction for 1Password. Can’t wait to see where this goes next!.env files should support more file formats
Hey, I was incredibly excited to see the 1Password beta supporting .env files. After testing it out in the latest beta, I understand that this is incredibly useful for environments that support traditional .env files. However, as someone working with building mobile apps, specifically for iOS, I was hoping that the new feature was a tad more flexible, enabling me to use it in .swift files. Specifically, I was hoping that the new feature would replace references to secrets in existing files rather than creating a new (temporary) file. If it were replacing references in existing files, we could use the .env support in 1Password's Environment with any file template. I understand the downsides to this, but in the mobile landscape it's not uncommon to hardcode select secrets in the binary and even when doing so, we'd like to keep those secrets out of version control. Therefore, we have .swift template files that look like this: enum Secrets { enum SomeService { static var apiKey: String { "{{ op://Acme GitHub Actions/Some Service API Key/API Key }}" } } } These files are named Secrets.tpl.swift and are stored in version control. We use `op inject` to inject the secrets into these files and output them as Secrets.swift, so they're referenced at compile time. Secrets.swift is not checked into version control, of course. I was hoping that we could mount Secrets.tpl.swift or similar in 1Password Environments to have it handle the secrets for us, as .env files aren't really a thing in iOS development. I'm excited to use 1Password Environments with the new .env files in backend development, but I hope you'll consider making it more flexible, so it can accommodate more platforms too. Best regards, Simon B. Støvring
Feature Request: API Endpoints for 1Password Usage Reports
Today, it doesn't look possible to pull the usage reports via API. We have clients who request these reports, and having to login to each customer and manually pull the report from within the Admin portal can be very time consuming. Having the ability to pull these reports via API would speed up this process, and even allow us to schedule these reports.
Automated Connect server token rotation
I've been evaluating whether I can use 1Password Connect for configuration/secrets management for my company's services. 1Password Connect looks very appealing for several reasons: No rate limits. No usage limits. As a 1Password customer, we have unlimited access to this offering. Uniform UI. We already use 1Password for managing passwords and various secrets used during local development. It would be very nice to use the same interface to manage lifecycle of configurations and secrets that are used by production services. Pretty straightforward REST API and SDKs in languages that we use allows getting the latest config/secret values at runtime. I am not very interested in using 1Password Connect Operator (or using k8s Secrets in general) since this provides secrets to the service at deploy time. I appreciate the ability to automatically redeploy the service when the underlying 1Password item changes but this works well only for stateless services. I prefer getting configurations/secrets at runtime over an API. I started experimenting with this offering and working out how to integrate it into our systems. The docs recommend creating a Connect server token for every service which makes a lot of sense. And the docs strongly suggest setting an expiration on this token which also makes sense. After all, it's a static credential not tied to the identity of the service that uses it; so frequent rotation should reduce the risk of a leaked token causing damage. But the issue is that I don't see a way to automate this rotation given the permission model that is in use today. Is it possible for either a Service Account or a Connect client to manage connect tokens (create/delete tokens)? I was thinking of integrating 1Password connect as follows: Our deployment pipeline is high trust. It would use either Service Account or Connect client credentials that expire infrequently. It's OK for a human to ensure this credential doesn't expire and rotate it when necessary. When a service deployment is kicked off, the deployment pipeline creates a new Connect token. The pipeline ensures that the newly created Connect token is accessible to the service as an environment variable. Once the service is deployed and is considered healthy, the old Connect token (used by the previous deployment of the service) is deleted. In this setup, the deployment pipeline can create the new Connect token with a relatively short expiry and we can assume that every service gets redeployed more often than this expiration period. I think this setup is pretty reasonable but I don't see a way of giving the deployment pipeline access to create/delete Connect tokens. I tried using a Service Account to create a Connect token via the CLI and got 403. I see that it's possible to give a group access to manage Secrets Automation, but I don't think it's possible to make a Service Account a member of some group. Correct me if I am wrong. I also tried using a Connect client to create a new Connect token and this didn't work: "op connect token create" doesn't work with Connect. https://developer.1password.com/docs/connect/manage-connect of your docs mentions: "You can use 1Password.com or the https://developer.1password.com/docs/connect/api-reference/ to: ... https://developer.1password.com/docs/connect/manage-connect#create-a-token and https://developer.1password.com/docs/connect/manage-connect#revoke-a-token Connect server tokens." but I think it's a typo. As things stand today, Connect server token rotation can only be done by a human user which doesn't scale beyond a handful of services. If I were to go down that path, I would have to set expiration to a longer period which affects security. This makes 1Password Connect a lot less appealing. Please let me know if I am missing something and if there is a way to automate token rotation.
Edit items (json) without losing passkeys
Just came across this fun notice in the docs: "JSON item templates do not support passkeys. If you use a JSON template to update an item that contains a passkey, the passkey will be overwritten. To fix this, you can restore a previous version of the item." Which mean this method of editing an item is out the window for any items which contain passkeys :( Want to bump this issue, and also say that perhaps a different kind of programmatic update without needing to pass in the entire json blob could be useful.
Feature Request: Linking Address to Multiple Logins
Hello 1Pass Developers, I'm currently in grad school, so my address has been changing a lot lately, and it's been a real pain to track all the accounts that I need to update my address in. I have started a spreadsheet that tells me all the accounts that I regularly use that have a certain address associated so that next time I move, I remember to update the important accounts (bank, medical, etc.) - But I figure it would be way easier to do that if you could link certain addresses (from a profile) to accounts that use it. That way, I could go into the profile with my old address and see all the accounts I need to change (similar to hyperlinking (Wikipedia) or back-linking (Obsidian). Just a suggestion that I would really love to see, but maybe there's already something similar - please let me know if so!
API key storage
In the new "Developer" tools, I'd love to see proper API key storage. Honestly a lot of this can be accomplished with standard 1Password tools but I want to keep passwords separate from API keys whether by category or just plain feature separation into developer tools. It would be great if the browser extension could differentiate between an API key / token and a password. Even if it can't it would be great to have an option to specify API vs password. One key difference between passwords and API keys is that on one site you generally have a single login/password but with API keys you have one site and many keys usually with key/value pairs. -- Example -- Type: API Site: Anthropic URL: console.anthropic.com Key name: Project A Key value: [32bit key value] Key name: Project B Key value: [32bit key value] Key name: Project C Key value: [32bit key value] --- \ Example --- Again, I understand you can make this work with existing passwords but API keys should be treated differently and have their own feature space. This is a good feature for developers, and when evaluating a 1password for Business feature space an IT admin has to deal with a lot of API keys and it would be good to store them securely and easily be able to identify which API keys they may need to rotate. API keys could also be worked into Watchtower as API keys that have been leaked or exposed in data breaches. API keys are not just used within .env files, it could be website and even AI desktop tools like MCP server settings.
Local Environment File Partial Override and Merging
First of all I am very pleased with the announcement of the new environment feature to mount into local .env files! For our use case it would be beneficial to allow merging different environments into the same .env file or to allow partial overrides of values locally that are persisting locking of the desktop application. For local development, we have a single starter .env file with a lot of empty values and not all of these values are used by all developers. For example we have an authentication related section that contains secrets that are per-developer. For example the developer specific Github PAT, Social Auth provider App identifiers and credentials. These should be still stored in the single env file that is used during development and we would like to avoid fragmentation into multiple files at the moment, as it complicates our containerized configuration. So I have two related feature requests: Would it be possible to allow merging of different environments into a single mounted file (conflict resolution aside for now)? Would it be possible to allow partial overrides of specific values based on the employee vault or local environment?1Password Environments should enable grouping environments by service
Hi, The new .env management feature in 1Password is incredibly handy, and I can definitely see us adopting it for our backend services. It makes working with environment variables much more convenient. That said, I’d like to share some concerns regarding scalability. We have several services, each with multiple environments such as development, staging, production, and feature-specific environments. In 1Password Environments, these all of these environments appear side by side in a single list, regardless of which service they belong to. This results in naming schemes like "[Service]: [Environment]". While workable, this approach becomes harder to manage as we scale across multiple services. To illustrate, I’ve included a screenshot below showing what I anticipate the structure to look like in our setup. In this case, Service A and Service B have no relation to each other, yet their environments are intermingled. A way of grouping services would make this much clearer and easier to navigate. Best regards, Simon B. Støvring
